← Library
Bombay High CourtCAL/22/2025ca disposed off

Adhunik Grihanirman Vittiya Corpn. Ltd. Dhantoli v. Jitendra S/O Ramlal Desai And Others

2024-05-09Hon'Ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare1 pages

1 cal 22.2025.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.

Company Application (CAL) No. 22 of 2025 in Company Petition No. 1 of 2008 (D) [In the matter of Adhunik Grih Nirman Vittiya Corporation Ltd. (in liqn.)] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. J. M. Gandhi, Advocate for the applicants Mr. Shriniwas V. Deshpande, Advocate for the Official Liquidator with Mr. Deepak Persoya, Official Liquidator CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE J.

DATED : 09-05 -2025 By present application, the applicants have sought to recall order dated 24-1-2025 and to grant one more opportunity to comply order dated 2-2-2024.

As regards recalling order, it appears that this Court, taking aid of provisions of Maharashtra Protection of Interests of Depositors (In Financial Establishments) Act, 1999, took a view that provisions will have overriding effect on the provisions of Companies Act, 1956. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that this finding runs contrary to provisions under Sections 9 and 529A of the Companies Act. Mr. Deshpande, learned counsel for the Official Liquidator would support the application and seeks time to place on record certain rulings on this point. List on 13-6-2025.

(Anil L. Pansare, J.) wasnik Signed by: Mr. A. Y. Wasnik Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 09/05/2025 18:02:40