Javed Manoj Tadvi v. The Union Of India Through Its Secretary

37.2025CP+.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

62 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 37 OF 2025 IN CP/186/2024 JAVED MANOJ TADVI

VERSUS

THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY ...

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Kulkarni P.A. AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. S.A. Gaikwad Advocate for Respondent nos.5 and 6 : Mr. Gujar V.V. ...

AND 65 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 140 OF 2025 IN CP/226/2022 AMBAJI CHATRSING PAWARE

VERSUS

MILIND MHASEKAR THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Kulkarni P.A.

AGP for Respondent/State : Mrs.U.S. Bhosale Advocate for Respondent nos.5 and 6 : Mr. Jain R.N. AND 72 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 321 OF 2025 IN CP/542/2022 LAXMAN DILVARSING NAIK

VERSUS

MILIND MHASEKAR THE STATE OF MAHRASHTRA ...

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Kulkarni P.A. AGP for Respondent/State : Mr.K.S. Patil Advocate for Respondent no.5 : Mr. Jain R.N.

...

CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.

DATED : 29th SEPTEMBER, 2025.

ORDER :

.

Learned advocate for the petitioners submits that the

37.2025CP+.odt petitioners are getting only Rs.4,000/- to Rs.5,000/- per month, when as per the directions of this Court they are entitled for minimum basic pay scale of approximately Rs.29,500/-. Though work is being extracted by the respondents from petitioners, they are being paid meager payment.

2.

We give four weeks time to the respondents to comply with the directions given by this Court, failing which contempt proceedings shall be initiated against the respondents.

3.

The State shall pay the amounts to the petitioners, at least part of the amounts, prior to Diwali.

4.

Stand over to 3rd November, 2025. To be heard along with Contempt Petition No.1049/2024 and other connected matters. (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,J.) ( NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI,J.) sga