Sarpanch And Gramsevak Grampanchayat Ganpatipule v. Pranesh Chintamani Mayekar And ORS

23-CRA51-2025.DOC Santosh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 51 OF 2025 SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Sarpanch/Gramsevak, Grampanchayat Ganpatipule ...Applicant

Versus

Pranesh Chintamnai Mayekar and ors.

...Respondents

SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2025.02.05 10:21:17 +0530 Mr. Shriram Kulkarni, for the Applicant.

CORAM:

N. J. JAMADAR, J.

DATED:

4th FEBRUARY, 2025 PC:- 1.

Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant.

2.

Mr. Kulkarni, the learned Counsel for the applicant, on instructions seeks leave to withdraw the application. 3.

Mr. Kulkarni further submits that in the impugned order the learned Civil Judge has made certain observations regarding the bona fide of the action and good faith of the officers and the employees of the village panchayat. Those observations were not warranted for determining the application under Order VII Rule 11.

4.

The Court considers it expedient to clarify that the learned Civil Judge would not be influenced by any of the observations in the impugned order regarding the bona fide 1/2

23-CRA51-2025.DOC of the action and good faith of the officers/employees of the village panchayat, while deciding other applications and adjudicating the suit.

5.

With the aforesaid clarification, the application stands dismissed.

[N. J. JAMADAR, J.] 2/2