Shri. Anil Hariram Bhatia v. Shri. Ramesh Nenumal Bhatia And ORS

902 CRA 612.25.DOC

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 612 OF 2025 Anil Hariram Bhatia ..Applicant

Versus

Ramesh Nenumal Bhatia And Ors

...Respondents

Mr. Amit Pai, for applicant.

CORAM:

N. J. JAMADAR, J.

DATE :

06th JANUARY 2026 P.C.:

1.

Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant.

2.

The learned Counsel for applicant submits that, though the Court had expressed its disinclination to entertain the application, he had not sought leave to withdraw the application, and, Para Nos. 2 and 3 of the order dated 23rd December, 2025 be accordingly corrected.

3.

The learned Counsel for applicant submits that, he had no SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2026.01.08 10:07:15 +0530 SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI instructions to make the statement to withdraw the application. 4.

After hearing the learned Counsel for the applicant, this Court had expressed its disinclination to entertain the application as, in the circumstances of the case, the Court was of the view that, the issues regarding court fees and the 1/2 SAINATH

902 CRA 612.25.DOC tenability of the suit were required to be settled and decided by the Trial Court.

5.

In view of the submissions made today, Paras No. 2 and 3 of the order 23rd December, 2025 be substituted as under:- "2.

Having heard the learned Counsel for the applicant, the Court is disinclined to entertain the application as the issues regarding the court fees and tenability of the suit are required to be settled and decided by the Trial Court."

3.

The Civil Revision Application thus stands dismissed."

6.

Rest of the order remains unaltered.

7.

Corrected order be uploaded.

[N. J. JAMADAR, J.] 2/2 SAINATH