Kashinath Sonji Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra Through The Collector Jalgaon And ORS.

2026:BHC-AUG:835 1 935 to 937 ca 10.26

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 935 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10 OF 2026 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 22609 OF 2025 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION STAMP NO. 22610 OF 2025 Kashinath Sonji Patil .. Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents AND 936 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13 OF 2026 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 22593 OF 2025 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION STAMP NO. 22594 OF 2025 Bhagwat Janrao Patil .. Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents AND 937 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 108 OF 2026 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 22596 OF 2025 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION STAMP NO. 22597 OF 2025 Ramesh Laxman Padol .. Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri S. A. Mulla, Advocate h/f Mrs. Usha V. yadav, Advocate for the Applicant in all matters.

Shri S. N. Morampalle and Shri S. V. Hange, A.G.P. for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in respective matters.

2 935 to 937 ca 10.26 CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.

DATE : 08TH JANUARY, 2026.

FINAL ORDER :

.

Applicants seek to condone delay of 90 days caused in filing application seeking restoration of the first appeals along with civil applications. For the reasons stated in the application, it is desirable to condone the delay and restore the first appeals along with civil applications.

2.

The applicants undertake to remove office objections. For the reasons stated in the applications the civil applications are allowed in terms of prayer clauses 'B' and 'C'. The civil applications are disposed of.

[ SHAILESH P. BRAHME J. ] bsb/Jan. 26