Pradip S/O Shivdas Rathod And ORS. v. The State Of Maharashtra Through The Collector Jalna And ORS.
1 7- CA.7816-25 (7 to 13).odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD 7 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7816 OF 2025 IN FAST/13172/2025 SAKHAHARI NIVRUTTI WAGHMARE AND ANR
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR JALNA AND ORS.
AND 8 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8302 OF 2025 IN FAST/16001/2025 UDDHAV S/O SUDAMRAV RAUT
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, JALNA COLLECTOR OFFICE JALNA AND OTHERS AND 10 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 37 OF 2026 IN FAST/31857/2025 PREMCHAND ASHRUBA KHARAT.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA TROUGH THE COLLECTOR JALNA AND OTHERS.
AND 11 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 40 OF 2026 IN FAST/31864/2025 ANKUSH RAMCHANDRA DEVKAR.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR JALNA AND OTHERS.
AND 12 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 41 OF 2026 IN FAST/32599/2025 PRADIP S/O SHIVDAS RATHOD AND ORS.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR JALNA AND ORS.
AND
2 7- CA.7816-25 (7 to 13).odt 13 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 67 OF 2026 IN FAST/31889/2025 PANDURANG JIJASAHEB SOLANKE.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR JALNA AND OTHERS.
...
Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Kakde S. M.
AGPs for Respondent/s-State : Mr. V. V. Jahagirdar, Mr. S. N. Morampalle, Mr. N. D. Raje, respectively.
...
CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.
DATE : 18.03.2026 PER COURT :- 1.
Heard both sides.
2.
Applicants seek to condone delay and they have placed on record chart which is as follows :
3 7- CA.7816-25 (7 to 13).odt 3.
Learned AGPs have opposed the respective applications for condonation of delay.
4.
The averments of the applications have not been controverted by the respondents. I find no malafides on the part of the applicants to approach this Court belatedly. The delay is not intentional. Applicants are ready to forego the interest and statutory benefits for the delayed period. 5.
In case of first two matters i.e. Civil Application Nos.7816 of 2025 and 8302 of 2025, applicants shall not be entitled for interest and statutory benefits for the delayed period and period of lapses from the date of filing applications till passing of the first order.
6.
Civil applications are allowed accordingly and the delay caused in filing first appeals stands condoned on condition that applicants shall not be entitled to interest and statutory benefits for the delayed period. They are deprived of benefits for lapses in above referred matters also.
First Appeals 7.
Matters shall be decided finally at the admission stage on the next date.
4 7- CA.7816-25 (7 to 13).odt 8.
Call for Record and Proceedings from the concerned Court.
9.
Print is dispensed with.
(SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.) ...
vmk/-