Fulabai W/O Sidhanna Upase. v. The State Of Maharashtra Through The Dist Collector Osmanabad And ANR.

2026:BHC-AUG:2544 1 59 & 60 ca 576.26

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 59 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 576 OF 2026 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 29305 OF 2025 Babu Saheblal Mulla .. Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra, through the Collector Osmanabad and another .. Respondents Ms. L. R. Thakur, Advocate h/f Shri Laxmikant C. Patil, Advocate for the Applicant.

Shri S. N. Morampalle, A.G.P. for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. 60 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 592 OF 2026 IN FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 36667 OF 2025 Fulabai Sidhanna Upase .. Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra, through the Collector Osmanabad and another .. Respondents Ms. L. R. Thakur, Advocate h/f Shri Laxmikant C. Patil, Advocate for the Applicant.

Shri N. D. Raje, A.G.P. for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.

DATE : 20TH JANUARY, 2026.

FINAL ORDER :

.

Issue notice to the respondents. Learned A. G. P. waives

2 59 & 60 ca 576.26 notice for the respondents - state in respective matters. 2.

Applicants seek condonation of delay of 5160 and 5608 days respectively caused in preferring first appeals. For the reasons stated in the applications the delay is sought to be condoned. Applicants undertake to give up the interest and statutory benefits for the delayed period.

3.

Averments of the applications have not been seriously disputed by the respondents. There are no malafides on the part of the applicants in preferring appeals belated. Applicants undertake to give up the interest and statutory benefits for the delayed period.

4.

For the reasons stated in the applications, the applications are allowed. The delay stands condoned subject to forfeiture of interest and statutory benefits for the delayed period. Office shall register the first appeals. The civil applications are disposed of.

[ SHAILESH P. BRAHME J. ] bsb/Jan. 26