Balabhau Yenkaji Kaste (Died) Thr. Lrs Asaram Balasaheb Kaste And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra Through The Collector Parbhani And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD 20 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6358 OF 2023 IN FAST/3402/2023 DNYANESHWAR VITHOBA KHARABE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR JALNA AND ORS ...
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. V.D. Bhise h/f Mr. Kakde Kakde S.M. AGP for Respondent nos. 1 & 2 : Mr. V. V. Jahagirdar Advocate for Respondent No. 3 : Mr. Vinod M. Vibhute ...
AND 21 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6367 OF 2023 IN FAST/3365/2023 RAMBHAU ROHIDAS JADHAV AND ANR
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR JALNA AND ORS ...
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. V.D. Bhise h/f Mr. Kakde Kakde S.M. AGP for Respondent nos. 1 to 3 : Mr. S.N. Morampalle ...
AND 22 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6377 OF 2023 IN FAST/3295/2023 VISHAL JAYRAM RATHOD AND ANR
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR JALNA AND ORS ...
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. V.D. Bhise h/f Mr. Kakde Kakde S.M. AGP for Respondent nos. 1 & 2 : Mr. N.D. Raje Advocate for Respondent No. 3 : Mr. M.S. Taur ...
AND 23 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6379 OF 2023 IN FAST/3297/2023 VISHAL JAYRAM RATHOD
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR JALNA AND ORS ...
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. V.D. Bhise h/f Mr. Kakde Kakde S.M. AGP for Respondent nos. 1 & 2 : Mr. V.V. Jahagirdar Advocate for Respondent No. 3 : Mr. M.S. Taur ...
AND 1/3
24 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6469 OF 2023 IN FAST/10333/2023 MURLIDHAR BANSHI RATHOD
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR, JALNA AND OTHERS ...
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. V.D. Bhise h/f Mr. Kakde Kakde S.M. AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. S. N. Morampalle ...
AND 25 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2753 OF 2025 IN FAST/1876/2025 BALABHAU YENKAJI KASTE (DIED) THR. LRS ASARAM BALASAHEB KASTE AND ANR
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR PARBHANI AND ORS ...
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. V.D. Bhise h/f Mr. Kakde Kakde S.M. AGP for Respondent nos. 1 & 2 : Mr. N.D. Raje Advocate for Respondent No. 3 : Mrs. Chaitali Chaudhari Kutti ...
CORAM
: SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.
DATE : 09.03.2026 PER COURT :
Heard both sides. The applicants in all these appeals are seeking condonation of delay ranging from 1098 to 4058 days. 2.
The applications are contested by the respondents. 3.
The averments of the applications have not been traversed by the respondents. There is no reason to infer any mala fides on the part of the applicants. They are ready to give up interest and statutory benefits for the delayed period. There are lapses on the part of the applicants, which can be demonstrated as follows:
2/3
Sr.No.
C.A. No.
Delay caused Date of filing of application Date of first order 1) 6358/2023 01.02.2023 26.10.2023 2) 6367/2023 01.02.2023 26.10.2023 3) 6377/2023 01.02.2023 26.10.2023 4) 6379/2023 01.02.2023 26.10.2023 5) 6469/2023 27.03.2023 12.02.2024 5) 2753/2025 15.01.2025 20.08.2025 4.
For the reasons stated in the applications, delay stands condoned on condition that the applicants shall not be entitled to interest and statutory benefits for the delayed period and lapses from the date of filing of the application till date of securing first order as enumerated in the table referred above.
5.
The Civil Applications are disposed of.
FIRST APPEALS :
6.
Admit. Learned A.G.P. waives service for the respondent/State. Learned counsels Mr. Vibhute, Taur and Mrs. Kutti waives service for the respondents/Acquiring Body in respective appeals. 7.
Call for record and proceedings.
8.
Print is dispensed with.
( SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.) mkd/- 3/3