The Executive Engineer Central Railway Pune And ORS v. Sangita Babasaheb Goyakar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH

AT AURANGABAD 27 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12285 OF 2021 IN FAST/26431/2021 C.e.o M.i.d.c., For Regional Manager Jalgaon

VERSUS

Vijay Bhikanrao Deshmukh And Ors WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12286 OF 2021 IN FAST/26431/2021 28 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3566 OF 2025 IN FAST/6844/2025 The Executive Engineer Central Railway Pune And Ors

VERSUS

Sangita Babasaheb Goyakar And Ors WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3558 OF 2025 IN FAST/6833/2025 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3559 OF 2025 IN FAST/6833/2025 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3567 OF 2025 IN FAST/6844/2025 29 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7189 OF 2025 IN FAST/20312/2025 The Commissioner, Latur City Municipal Corporation

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra Through The Collector And Ors WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7191 OF 2025 IN FAST/20312/2025 30 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10728 OF 2025 IN FAST/22986/2025 The State Of Maharashtra Through Collector Jalna And Ors

VERSUS

Shaikh Siddiqui Shaikh Akbar

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10729 OF 2025 IN FAST/22986/2025 31 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 563 OF 2026 IN FAST/255/2026 Gopal S/o. Dhaondiba Satpute And Anr.

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra Through The Collector Latur And Anr.

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 566 OF 2026 IN FAST/266/2026 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 564 OF 2026 IN FAST/272/2026 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 565 OF 2026 IN FAST/269/2026 32 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1006 OF 2026 IN FAST/23284/2021 Pitambar Dodha Patil And Ors.

VERSUS

The Ex. Director, Tapi Irrigation Development Corporation Jalgaon And Ors.

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3124 OF 2022 IN FAST/23284/2021 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3125 OF 2022 IN FAST/23284/2021 ...

AGPs for Respondent/s-State : Mr. S. N. Morampalle, Mr. V. V. Jahagirdar, Mr. N. D. Raje, respectively.

...

CORAM :

SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.

DATE :

MARCH 04, 2026 PER COURT :- 1.

Time of four (4) weeks is granted to take steps against the dead respondents as well as unserved respondents.

2.

In case, fresh address is provided for the service of notice, then notice shall be issued, returnable after four (4) weeks, thereafter.

3.

In case for some technical reasons, the notices are unserved, re-issue notice to the unserved respondents, returnable four (4) weeks thereafter.

4.

In case of remark of want of time, the time is extended by four (4) weeks.

5.

Interim relief, if any, to continue till the next date. 6.

Private service is permitted.

(SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.) umesh/-