The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Others v. Morsing Dagdu Chavan
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
(901) CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3677 OF 2025 IN REVIEW APPLICATION (ST) NO.7412 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO.7580 OF 2024 The State of Maharashtra and Ors.
....Applicants
Versus
Ukha Prabhu Chavan and Ors.
....Respondents AND
(902) CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3678 OF 2025 IN REVIEW APPLICATION (ST) NO.7408 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO.7801 OF 2024 The State of Maharashtra and Ors.
....Applicants
Versus
Chotu Harsing Rathod Died through legal heirs and Ors.
....Respondents AND
(903) CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3679 OF 2025 IN REVIEW APPLICATION (ST) NO.7418 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO.891 OF 2024 The State of Maharashtra and Ors.
....Applicants
Versus
Morsing Dagadu Chavan ....Respondent ---- Mr. R.K. Ingole-Patil, AGP for the Applicants. Mr. Mahesh Deshmukh i/b. Mr. D.K. Thote for the Respondents. ----
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & Y.G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.
(THROUGH V.C.) DATE : 17th APRIL, 2026 P.C. :- 1.
This is a Special Bench constituted to consider the Review Petitions in the light of the order dated 25th July, 2024 passed in Writ Petition Nos.7580 of 2024, 891 of 2024 and 7801 of 2024, by this Court (Coram : Ravindra V. Ghuge and Y.G. Khobragade, JJ.).
2.
Heard the learned Advocates for the respective sides. Considering that the delay is only 193 days and cannot be termed as either inordinate or deliberate, these three Civil Applications are allowed and the delay is condoned.
3.
The Review Petitions be registered forthwith. 4.
The Review Applicants rely upon the communication dated 31st October, 2015 issued by the Assistant Director, Town
Planning, Aurangabad, addressed to the Sub-Divisional Officercum-Acquisition Officer, Sillod. The said letter mentions that the two villages, namely नांदगाव and नांदतांडा, which were the subject matter of the Writ Petition, are covered by the Aurangabad District Rehabilitation and Resettlement Scheme designed for the Aurangabad District. The said communication indicates that the multiplier is 1.5 and not 2, as is granted by the Court. Mr. IngolePatil submits that his clients have not supplied him a copy of the said Scheme and he desires to place the same on record. He, therefore, prays for one adjournment.
5.
By consent of the parties, stand over to 4th May, 2026 at 5.00 p.m.
(Y.G. KHOBRAGADE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)