Sadashiv Honaji Toge v. The State Of Maharashtra Through The Collector Jalna And ORS.
2026:BHC-AUG:2488 ( 1 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD 28 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4258 OF 2025 IN FAST/6061/2025 KUSHAWARTABAI GANGADHAR MAIND
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR JALNA AND ORS. AND 29 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4259 OF 2025 IN FAST/6065/2025 SAKHARAM NARAYAN SAPKAL (DIED) THR. LRS BADRINARAYAN SAKHARAM SAPKAL AND ANR
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR JALNA AND ORS. AND 30 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4260 OF 2025 IN FAST/6074/2025 JITENDRA BADRINARAYAN SAPKAL
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR JALNA AND ORS. AND 31 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4262 OF 2025 IN FAST/5989/2025 SOPAN BHIKAJI KHALSE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR JALNA AND ORS AND 32 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4263 OF 2025 IN FAST/6068/2025 RANGNATH KISAN TOGE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR JALNA AND ORS. AND 33 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4264 OF 2025 IN FAST/6048/2025 SADASHIV HONAJI TOGE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR JALNA AND ORS. AND 34 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4267 OF 2025 IN FAST/5998/2025
( 2 ) SURESH JANARDHAN SAWANT
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR JALNA AND ORS. AND 35 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4314 OF 2025 IN FAST/6072/2025 TRIMBAK SADASHIV TOGE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR JALNA AND ORS. AND 36 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4323 OF 2025 IN FAST/6055/2025 YAMUNABAI SHAMRAV SAPKAL (DIED) THR. LRS BABURAO SHAMRAV SAPKAL
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR JALNA AND ORS. AND 37 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4324 OF 2025 IN FAST/5986/2025 MUKUNDA BALABHAU RAUT
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR JALNA AND ORS ...
Mr. Firoj Ahmad Shirpurkar h/f. Mr. More Kumar Gaurav M., Advocate for Applicants in all matters Mr. S. N Morampalle, Mr. N. D. Raje and Mr. S. V. Hange, AGPs for Respondents/State in respective matters ...
CORAM
: SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.
DATE : 21.01.2026 PER COURT :- .
Applicants seek to condone the delay ranging from 314 days to 881 days.
2.
The averments of the applications have not been controverted by the applicants. There are no malafides on the part of the applicants. It is desirable to
( 3 ) condone the delay.
3.
The delay stands condoned on condition that the applicants shall not be entitled to the interest and statutory benefits for the delayed period. FIRST APPEALS STAMP NO.
4.
Admit. Learned AGPs waive service of notice for respondent-s/State in respective matters.
5.
Call for Record and Proceeding. Print is dispensed with. 6.
The appellants shall not be entitled to the interest and statutory benefits for the delayed period.
( SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. ) PRW