Radhesham Jagnath Mittal v. Anna Baburao Jadhav (Died) Thr. Ganadhar Anna Jadhav And ORS

30-CA-4423-25.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4423 OF 2025 IN FA/1942/2024 RADHESHAM JAGNATH MITTAL

VERSUS

ANNA BABURAO JADHAV (DIED) THR. GANADHAR ANNA JADHAV AND ORS ....

Mr. S. V. Lohiya, Advocate for the Applicant Mr. V. B. Kulkarni h/for Mr. A. S. Usmanpurkar, Advocate for Respondent No.2 ....

CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.

DATE : 21.04.2025 PER COURT :- .

Office note shows that the prayer clause (B) is not proper and Applicant has not removed office objections as to court fees.

2.

Mr. Lohiya, the learned advocate appearing for the Applicant undertakes to remove aforesaid objections within a period of two weeks from today.

3.

Leave to correct the prayer clause is granted. Amendment to be carried out within the aforesaid period. 4.

Stand over to 30.06.2025.

[ S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. ] HRJadhav