Kalu Dalsing Rathod v. The State Of Maharashtra Through The Collector Jalna And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH

AT AURANGABAD 77 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7754 OF 2025 IN FAST/6222/2025 KALU DALSING RATHOD

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR JALNA AND ORS.

AND 78 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7814 OF 2025 IN FAST/6186/2025 RAMBHAU DALSING RATHOD

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR JALNA AND ORS.

...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. P. A. Bharat h/f Mr. Pingale D. M. AGPs for Respondent/s-State : Mr. N. D. Raje, Mr. V. V. Jahagirdar, respectively.

...

CORAM :

SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.

DATE :

18.03.2026 PER COURT :- 1.

Heard both sides.

2.

Applicants seek to condone delay of 2791 and 2694 days in preferring respective first appeals. They are ready to give up interest and statutory benefits for the delayed period.

3.

The contesting party respondent No.3 has not caused appearance. The contents of the applications have not been denied by the respondents. The delay is unintentional. There are lapses as the applications were filed on 17.02.2025 and first order was secured on 02.12.2025. Those are attributable to the applicants. The delay stands condone. 4.

Civil applications are allowed on condition that applicants shall not be entitled to interest and statutory benefits for the delayed period as well as period for lapses. (SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.) ...

vmk/-