← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/8578/2025disposed off

Kalyan Laxman Pole And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr Its Principal Secretary And Others

2026-02-06Hon'Ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker , Hon'Ble Justice Vaishali Patil-Jadhav2 pages

2026:BHC-AUG:6118-DB

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

923 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8578 OF 2025 IN WP/2790/2021 Kalyan Laxman Pole And Others

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra Thr Its Principal Secretary And Others .....

Adv. K. R. Choudhari h/f. Adv. S. B. Solanke for the Applicants Ms. V. P. Dama, AGP for the Respondent - State. Shri. A. G. Godhamgaonkar, Advocate for Respondent Nos.6A to 6D Shri. B. T. Bodkhe, Advocate for Respondent No.5 .....

CORAM :

ARUN R. PEDNEKER AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.

Dated :

FEBRUARY 6, 2026 PER COURT :- .

This is the Application for condonation of 502 days delay in bringing the legal representatives of Deceased Respondent No.6 on record.

2.

Learned Advocate for the Applicants submits that, Respondent No.6 expired on 24.11.2023. It is further submitted that the Applicants were not aware of the demise of Respondent No.6, as he was residing at Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar and upon gaining knowledge of the said fact, the present Application has been filed. He, therefore, submits that, the Application be allowed.

3.

The Application is opposed by learned Advocates appearing for the Respondents. It is submitted that, plausible explanation has not been offered by the Applicants for condonation of inordinate delay of 502 days and therefore, the Application be rejected.

4.

In view of the above submissions as well as for the reasons cited in the Application, the Application is allowed. Delay of 502 days is condoned. Abatement, if any, stands set aside. The Applicants are permitted to bring legal representatives of Respondent No.6 on record. Amendment be carried out accordingly. Application stands disposed of. (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.) ( ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. ) GGP