← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/9447/2025disposed off

The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Principal Secretary And Others v. Vijaysing Kisansingh Pardeshi

2026-05-07Hon'Ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre2 pages

2026:BHC-AUG:21895 937-WP-6420-18.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 937 WRIT PETITION NO. 6420 OF 2018 Vijaysing Kisansing Pardeshi

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra And Others WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 771 OF 2017 Vijaysing Kisansing Pardeshi

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra And Others WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1579 OF 2019 Vijaysing Kisansing Pardeshi

VERSUS

The Joint Registrar Co Operative Societies Mumbai And Others ......

Mr. P.D. Pachate, Advocate for Petitioner in all WPs. Mr. A.V. Hon for Respondent No. 7 to 14 IN WP/6420/18 and for Respondent No.1 in WP/1579/2018 Mr. G.K. Naik Thigale, Advocate for Respondent No.5 in WP/771/2017 Mr. R.B. Dhaware, AGP for Respondents-State in all WPs ......

CORAM

: SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.

DATE : 07 MAY, 2026 PER COURT :

1.

Heard the learned counsel for respective parties at length. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has submitted objections to the audit report before the Special Auditor, Class-I. After considering the entire record, the Special Auditor prepared a detailed

937-WP-6420-18.odt rectification report under Section 82 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 (for short, "the Act"). However, without considering the same, notice under Section 83 of the Act came to be issued calling upon the petitioner to file a reply and, pursuant thereto, the petitioner submitted a reply. Before passing of any order thereon, the petitioner approached the Joint Registrar (Dairy) by filing Revision Petition No.1 of 2015. The Joint Registrar (Dairy) dismissed the same by holding that the petitioner was given an opportunity of hearing. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to entertain the present petitions. However, it is made clear that the petitioner is at liberty to file a fresh reply and to place additional documents on record.

3.

It is expected that the authority conducting the enquiry shall consider entire the record and documents submitted by the petitioner and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law.

4.

The aforesaid exercise shall be completed within a period of two months from the date of uploading of this order. 5.

The writ petitions stand disposed of.

6.

Pending civil applications, if any, are also disposed of. [ SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE ] JUDGE S P Rane