Mahadeo Tukaram Dhapate v. The State Of Maharashtr Through The Collector, Beed And Another

( 1 ) 108 CA 10275 OF 2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 108 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10275 OF 2025 IN FAST/27660/2025 MAHADEO TUKARAM DHAPATE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTR THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, BEED AND ANOTHER ...

Mr. Bhise Raghvendra Diliprao, Advocate for Applicant Mr. N. D. Raje, AGP for Respondent/s-State ...

CORAM

: SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.

DATE : 20.02.2026 PER COURT :- .

The applicant seeks to condone delay of 2221 days in preferring the appeal. Despite service of notice, none appears for the contesting party. 2.

The averments of the application are uncontroverted. There is no reason to infer any oblique motive on the part of the applicant. He is ready to give up the interest and statutory benefits for the delayed period. 3.

The delay stands condoned on condition that the applicant shall not be entitled to the interest and statutory benefits for the delayed period. FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.

4.

Admit. Learned AGP waives service of notice for the respondent/s-State.

5.

Call for Record and Proceeding. Print is dispensed with. 6.

The appellant shall not be entitled to the interest and statutory benefits for the delayed period.

( SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. ) PRW