Rajendra Kishanrao Jadhav v. The State Of Maharashtra Through The Collector Jalna And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH

AT AURANGABAD 85 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10415 OF 2025 IN FAST/15566/2025 RAJENDRA KISHANRAO JADHAV

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR JALNA AND ORS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Jay r. Raundale h/f Mr. More Kumar Gaurav M.

AGP for Respondent/s-State : Mr. N. D. Raje.

...

CORAM :

SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.

DATE :

18.03.2026 PER COURT :- 1.

Heard both sides.

2.

Applicant seeks to condone delay of 3766 days in preferring first appeal.

3.

The contesting party respondent No.3 has not caused appearance despite service. Learned AGP waives service for respondent Nos.1 and 2/State. The contents of the application have gone uncontroverted. There is no reason to infer any oblique motive on the part of the applicant to cause delay.

Applicant is ready to give up the interest and statutory benefits for the delayed period. The delay stands condone. 4.

Civil application is allowed on condition that applicant shall not be entitled to statutory benefits and the interest for the delayed period.

First Appeal 5.

Admit.

6.

Learned AGP waives service of notice for respondents/State Authorities.

7.

Call for Record and Proceedings from the concerned Court.

8.

Print is dispensed with.

(SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.) ...

vmk/-