← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/10510/2025admittedallowedgrantedrule absolute

Ashok Ginu Rathod v. The General Manger Icici Lombard General Insurance Company

2026-01-09Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh2 pages

2026:BHC-AUG:830 916 ca.10510.25.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

916 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10510 OF 2025 IN FA/536/2025 ASHOK GINU RATHOD

VERSUS

THE GENERAL MANGER ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Swapnil Sunilkumar Dargad. Advocate for Respondent No.1 / Appellant : Mr. M. R. Deshmukh. ...

CORAM :

SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.

DATE :

09th January, 2026.

P.C.:

This application is for withdrawal of the amount deposited by the appellant in this Court as per the impugned judgment and award. Perused the application. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

The learned counsel for the appellant / insurance company strongly opposes the application and submits that additional premium is not paid for covering the passenger. He, therefore, prays to reject the application.

Perused the application and the impugned judgment and award. The learned counsel for the applicant has pointed out the judgment of the Honourable Supreme Court in the case of Sunita and

916 ca.10510.25.odt others Vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. and others, 2025 All SCR 1968, in which the Honourable Supreme Court held that, applying the above expositions of law, the Courts below ought to have directed the Insurance Company to indemnify the amount and thereafter recover the same.

Considering this position of law, it would be proper to partly allow the application. Hence, the following order :-

O R D E R

I.

The application is partly allowed.

II.

The applicant is permitted to withdraw 50% of the amount with accrued interest thereon deposited in this Court on furnishing usual undertaking. Further 25% of the amount with accrued interest thereon is allowed to be withdrawn on furnishing solvent surety/security to the satisfaction of learned Registrar (Judicial) of this Court. III.

The Registry is directed to not to insist for the actual valuation of the property of the surety.

IV.

The remaining amount be kept in fixed deposit in any nationalized bank till disposal of the appeal. [ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ] nga