The State Of Maharashtra Through The Collector, Latur And Other v. Mahadeo Pandhari Nadapude (Nadagude) And Another

2025:BHC-AUG:37726 1 20 ca 12687.25 for delay

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12687 OF 2025 FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 29085 OF 2025 Vinayak Venkatrao Deshmukh CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12689 OF 2025 FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 29097 OF 2025 Sharanappa Shivram Todkar Since deceased through his L.Rs.

Shantabai Sharanappa Todkar and others.. Respondents CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12695 OF 2025 FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 29094 OF 2025 Shrirang Shesherao Jadhav CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12693 OF 2025 FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 29091 OF 2025 Ram Dattu Salunke

2 20 ca 12687.25 for delay CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12691 OF 2025 FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 29088 OF 2025 Venkat Laxman Shrigandhe .. Respondents AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14128 OF 2025 FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 31463 OF 2025 Manohar Shivram Todkar CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14129 OF 2025 FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 31476 OF 2025 Ramkishan Jyotiram Gaikwad CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14131 OF 2025 FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 31473 OF 2025 Narayan Khandu Dhangar CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14133 OF 2025 FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 31466 OF 2025

3 20 ca 12687.25 for delay Vishwambhar Limbaji Maske CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14135 OF 2025 FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 31469 OF 2025 Ankush Limbaji Tivde AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13887 OF 2025 FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 30027 OF 2025 Mahadeo Pandhari Nadapude (Nadagude) and another .. Respondents Mrs. M. N. Ghanekar, A.G.P. for the Applicants in all matters. Shri S. S. Manale, Advocate for the Respondents - claimants in all matters.

CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.

DATE : 23RD DECEMBER, 2025.

FINAL ORDER :

.

Issue notice to the respondents. Mr. Manale, learned counsel waives notice for the respondents - claimants in all matters.

2.

Applicants seek condonation of delay ranging from 696 to

4 20 ca 12687.25 for delay 710 days caused in preferring first appeals. For the reasons stated in the applications, it is desirable to condone the delay. 3.

The averments in the applications are not controverted by the learned counsel for the respondents - claimants. There is no reason to infer any malafides on the part of the applicants. For the reasons stated in the applications, the civil applications are allowed. The delay stands condoned. Office is directed to register the first appeals. The civil applications are disposed of. [ SHAILESH P. BRAHME J. ] bsb/Dec. 25