Preeti Manohar Sakpal v. The Municipal Corporation Of Greater Mumbai

13-CP-330-2025.docx

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

rrpillai CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 330 OF 2025 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 874 OF 2024 Preeti Manohar Sakpal ...

Petitioner Vs.

The Municipal Corporation of ...

Respondent Greater Mumbai Mr. Abhishek Tripathi for the Petitioner.

Mr. Girish Godbole a/w. Mr. Om Suryavanshi i/b Ms. Komal Punjabi for the Respondent - BMC.

Mr. Sachin Hanamdar, AE, Maintenance, H-West Ward. CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.

DATE :

6th AUGUST 2025 ORDER :

1.

I have perused the papers of the additional affidavit of the petitioner and the two additional affidavits filed on behalf of the corporation. In view of the allegation made by the petitioner, I have examined the response of the concerned officer in affidavit dated 7th July 2025 read with the sketch annexed at Exhibit B to the affidavit. Considering the response in the affidavit dated 7th July 2025 and the contents of the additional affidavit dated 21st July 2025 and in by RAJESHWARI RAMESH PILLAI Date: 2025.08.06 22:39:34 +0200 particular paragraph nos. 4, 5 and 6 read with the structure RAJESHWARI RAMESH PILLAI 1/2

13-CP-330-2025.docx described in the suit notice, I am prima facie of the opinion that the officers of the corporation in breach of the orders passed by this court, has demolished the petitioner's structure.

2.

Learned senior counsel appearing for the corporation seeks time to explain the action taken by the officers of the corporation and if possible, rectify the actions. Since he seeks time to make an attempt to rectify the situation and file additional affidavit, I refrain today from issuing contempt notice.

3.

As requested by the learned senior counsel for the corporation, by way of last chance to the corporation, list this petition on 18th August 2025. To be listed under the caption for "Directions". To be listed along with Appeal from Order No. 874 of 2024.

[GAURI GODSE, J.] 2/2