Siddappa Y Kusugal v. Tridhaatu Realty And Infra Private Limited

4 CP-606-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.606 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 11191 OF 2017 by HUSENBASHA RAHAMAN NADAF Date:

2025.12.09 10:52:59 +0530 HUSENBASHA RAHAMAN NADAF Siddappa Y. Kusugal and Another

...Petitioners

Versus

Tridhaatu Realty and Infra Pvt.Ltd. & Ors.

...Respondents

**** Ms.Divya Barot i/by Maniklal Kher Ambalal & Co. for the Petitioners. Mr. S.H. Kankal, AGP for Respondent/State.

Ms. Archita Nair for Respondent nos.1 to 5.

**** CORAM : M.M. SATHAYE, J.

DATE : 8th DECEMBER, 2025 P.C. :

1.

As per last Order dated 01.12.2025, learned counsel for the petitioners has placed on record certain photographs of the flat in question (being flat no.304). The photographs are taken on record and marked 'X' collectively for identification. 2.

By earlier Order dated 10.11.2025, it was already clarified that this is a disposed of contempt petition and cannot be kept again and again for reporting compliance.

3.

It is a matter of record that during the pendency of the contempt petition, the documents are already executed, possession is received. Last Order dated 01.12.2025 also records that necessary NOC for transfer of electricity meter has already been issued by the Developer. Therefore substantial compliance is over. 4.

Dispute regarding whether some tiles have cracks and Husen

4 CP-606-2025.doc therefore need replacement, is squarely outside the scope of the contempt petition. It is not for this Court to micro-manage such disputes between the parties in contempt jurisdiction. 5.

It is accordingly directed that this contempt petition be treated as 'closed' and shall not be listed again.

(M.M. SATHAYE, J.) Husen