Arista N Nachane v. Nitin Krushnarao Nachane

3-mca-43-2025.doc Sbw

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 43 OF 2025 Arista N. Nachane ... Applicant v/s.

Nitin Krushnarao Nachane ... Respondent _______________________ Ms. Foram N. Chauhan for the Applicant.

Mr. Hitesh Vyas a/w Mr. Rasik Raut & Chandrashekhar Yadvv for the Respondent.

_______________________ CORAM : KAMAL KHATA, J.

DATED : 2ND SEPTEMBER 2025.

P.C. :

1.

The learned Advocate for the Respondent seeks the following correction in the order dated 22nd August 2025: (i) In paragraphs 3 and 4 substitutions of the following words:

a. "Respondent" with "Applicant";

b. "he" with "she"; and c. "his" with "her".

2.

The request is accepted. The original order be corrected and the corrected order be uploaded on the website of High Court of 1/2 SANDHYA BHAGU WADHWA by SANDHYA BHAGU WADHWA Date:

2025.09.04 11:06:44 +0530

3-mca-43-2025.doc Bombay.

3.

At the request of the learned Advocate for the Applicant-wife who states that her arguing counsel is in Delhi and therefore unable to appear in the matter today, list the matter on 11th September 2025 under the caption 'for Directions'. 4.

The learned Advocate for the Respondent submits that, the Applicant's requests have been accepted, the applications were heard and it now stands reserved for orders. Hence, the present Application is infructuous. It is further submitted that the adjournments sought are merely with a view to harass the Respondent.

(KAMAL KHATA, J.) 2/2