Supriya Dattatray Mayne v. Avadhoot Arun Bhongale

39. MCA 121-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 121 OF 2025 Supriya Dattatraya Mayne ..Applicant

Versus

ANAND SUDHAKAR SUDAME Avdhoot Arun Bhongale ..Respondent ANAND SUDHAKAR SUDAME Date: 2025.11.04 17:31:54 +0530 Mr. Omkar Wable, Advocate, for the Applicant Mr. Shrirang Katneshwarkar i/b. Mr. Siddharth Shitole, Advocates, for the Respondent CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

DATE : 03.11.2025 P. C.

1.

Mr. Wable, learned Counsel for the Applicant - wife submits that settlement talks are going on between the parties. The Applicant without prejudice to the rights and contentions had put forward an offer of Rs. 15,00,000/-. However, as talks were commenced, in order to put an end to the litigation, the Applicant even got ready to settle the dispute at Rs. 6,50,000/-. Mr. Wable, learned Counsel for the Applicant further submitted that even when the Applicant was ready to accept at Rs. 6,50,000/-, the Respondent backed out from the offer and stressed upon that a sum of Rs. 2,00,000/- should be adjusted towards Gold ornaments (stridhan) which according to the Respondent has been allegedly taken over by the Applicant.

Anand

39. MCA 121-2025.doc 2.

Mr. Katneshwarkar, learned Counsel for the Respondent seeks a short accommodation in order to take instructions from his client whether the dispute can be put to quietus.

3.

On the request made by Mr. Katneshwarkar, stand over to 10.11.2025 under the caption "For Settlement". (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) Anand