Ashwini Prashant Dubal v. Prashant Ajinath Dubal
KVM 1/2 58 - MCA 186 OF 2025.doc by KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR Date:
2025.10.14 16:57:32 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 186/2025 ASHWINI PRASHANT DUBAL ..APPLICANT VS PRASHANT AJINATH DUBAL ..RESPONDENT Ms.Vaishnavi Nagargoje i/b.Ms.Preeti Walimbe for the Applicant. Mr.Omkar A. Wable a/w. Mr.Maruti Sarkar for the Respondent. CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.
DATE : 13 OCTOBER, 2025 P.C. :- 1) This transfer petition has been filed by the applicant, wife of the husband, seeking transfer of section 9 petition filed by the husband before the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Karjat, Ahmednagar to the Family Court at Pune.
2) Mr. Wable, learned advocate appearing for the respondent-husband on instructions from his client submits that his client has no objection if the present Miscellaneous Civil Application is allowed and the petition is heard alongwith wife's divorce petition pending before the Family Court, Pune.
3) Miscellaneous Civil Application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). The said prayer clause (a) reads as under :-
KVM 2/2 58 - MCA 186 OF 2025.doc (a) That this Hon'ble Court be pleased to transfer the Marriage Petition No. 111 of 2024 pending before the Ld. Civil Judge, Senior Division, Karjat, Ahmednagar filed by the Respondent under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 to the file of Family Court, Pune 4) The proceedings of the Marriage Petition No. 111 of 2024 which is transferred from Civil Judge, Senior Division, Karjat, Ahmednagar to the Family Court, Pune, to be tagged and heard togetherwith Marriage Petition No. 2247 of 2024. Both the proceedings should be heard by one and the same Judge. 5) The parties are permitted to appear in the proceedings through video conferencing. However, if the Judge is of the opinion that their personal appearance is necessary, the parties shall be required to attend the proceedings in person before the Court. 6) The hearing of both the proceedings are hereby expedited.
7) Both the parties will not seek unnecessary adjournment in the proceedings.
[RAJESH S. PATIL, J.]