Mrs Huda Javed Gite Alias Miss Huda A R Ghole v. Mr Javed Mushtaqali Gite
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 213 OF 2025 Mrs. Huda Javed Gite alias ..Applicant Ms. Huda A. R. Ghole ANAND SUDHAKAR SUDAME
Versus
Mr. Javed Mushtaqali Gite ..Respondent by ANAND SUDHAKAR SUDAME Date: 2025.12.17 21:40:48 +0530 Mr. Vishal G. Salvi, Advocate, for the Applicant CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.
DATE : 15.12.2025 P. C.
1.
Mentioned. Not on board. Taken on board.
2.
A praecipe has been moved for Speaking to the Minutes of the Order dated 09.12.2025.
3.
Learned counsel for the Applicant submits that in the third line of para 2 of the aforesaid order, it has been inadvertently typed as :- Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) per month has been now has gone up to Rs. 7,00,000/- (Rupees Seven Lacs Only)".
instead of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) per month has been now has gone up to Rs. 17,00,000/- (Rupees Seventeen Lacs Only)". 4.
As also in the second line of para 4, it has been inadvertently typed as :- "The Respondent - husband who is staying and working in Dubai is in arrears of Rs. 7,00,000/- (Rupees Seven Lacs Only)". Instead of "The Respondent - husband who is staying and working in Kuwait is in arrears of Rs. 17,00,000/- (Rupees Seventeen Lacs Only)". 5.
Accordingly, the sentences mentioned in the Order dated 09.12.2025 be corrected as Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) per month has been now has gone up to Rs. 17,00,000/- (Rupees Seventeen Lacs Only)".
instead of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) per month has been now has gone up to Rs. 7,00,000/- (Rupees Seven Lacs Only)". And "The Respondent - husband who is staying and working in Kuwait is in arrears of Rs. 17,00,000/- (Rupees Seventeen Lacs Only)" Instead of "The Respondent - husband who is staying and working in Dubai is in arrears of Rs. 7,00,000/- (Rupees Seven Lacs Only)" 6.
Accordingly, the Order dated 09.12.2025, shall stand corrected as above. Rest of the order to remain as it is. 7.
Accordingly, the praecipe stands disposed of. (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)