Mr.Satish Shantaram Gite v. Mrs. Dipali Satish Gite

PPK 1/2 14_MCA_250_25.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 250 OF 2025 Satish Shantaram Gite ...

Applicant vs.

Dipali Satish Gite and another ...

Respondents Mr. Prathamesh Mondal a/w. Mr. Ajinkya A. Kamer, i/b. Arunkumar & Associates for applicant.

CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

DATE : 17th SEPTEMBER , 2025 P.C. :- 1.

After the matter was argued for some time, the learned counsel appearing for the applicant, on instructions of the applicant, who is present in Court today, makes a statement that the outstanding amount towards maintenance, which is around 3,12,000/-, would ₹ be deposited with the office of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nashik, within a period of 4 weeks from today. by PRIYA KAMBLI Date:

2025.09.22 11:16:23 +0530 PRIYA KAMBLI 2.

The statement made by the learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions of his client, is accepted as an undertaking given to this Court.

PPK 2/2 14_MCA_250_25.doc 3.

Learned counsel for the applicant also submits that the applicant is working as a senior clerk in the office of the Collector, Mumbai, and he is residing at Kalyan. He submits that the applicant is ready to reconcile his relationship with respondent No.1. 4.

Stand over to 15.10.2025.

5.

If the amount is not deposited before the next date of hearing, the present application shall stand rejected without reference to this Court.

6.

It is made clear that no application would be considered for extending the time to deposit the amount.

[RAJESH S. PATIL, J.]