Anil Yashwantrao Chavan v. Aishwarya Anil Chavan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 275 OF 2025 WITH MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 276 OF 2025 Anil Yashwantrao Chavan ..Applicant

Versus

ANAND SUDHAKAR SUDAME Aishwarya Anil Chavan ..Respondent by ANAND SUDHAKAR SUDAME Date:

2026.01.14 19:45:46 +0530 Mr. Vedchetan Patil a/w. Ms. Delzeen Dastoor & Mr. Parth Munde, Advocates, for the Applicant in both Applications Mr. Sachin S. Padaye, Advocate, for Respondent No. 1 CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

DATE : 12.01.2026 P. C.

1.

Mr. Padaye, learned Counsel seeks a short accommodation on behalf of Respondent No. 1 as he intends to file Vakalatnama on behalf of Respondent No. 1 - wife.

2.

Mr. Patil, learned Counsel for the Applicant submits that in MCA No. 275 of 2025, the Applicant, husband of Respondent No. 1, is seeking transfer of the D. V. proceedings filed by Respondent No. 1 - wife before the learned JMFC, Nashik to the learned JMFC, Pune or to the Family Court, Pune.

2.1 In MCA No. 276 of 2025, the Applicant is seeking transfer of the divorce proceedings filed by Respondent No. 1 - wife before the

learned Family Court, Nashik to the learned Family Court, Pune. 3.

It is the case of the Applicant that both the Applicant and Respondent No. 1 are residing and working at Pune. Respondent No. 1 with an ulterior motive filed the proceeding against the Applicant at Nashik. From the record, it can be seen that Respondent No. 1 is working with AXA Global Business Services Pvt. Ltd. in its office at Pune and Payslip for the month of March, 2024 is annexed at page No.102 of the MCA No. 276 of 2025. Similarly, at page No. 111, the details about gym known as "NOKOUT", wherein Respondent No. 1 has enrolled her name is enclosed. So also at page No. 121, the details about modeling agency - "CASTYOU" having its office at Pune are mentioned. The photographs of Respondent No. 1 are annexed to the MCA No. 276 of 2025 which mention Respondent No. 1's name on the top and bottom of page No. 121.

Hence, according to the Applicant, there will be no inconvenience to Respondent No. 1, if both the proceedings i. e. the D. V. proceeding and divorce proceeding are transferred to the learned Family Court, Pune. It is further submitted that in the D. V. proceeding filed under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (for short "D.V. Act") , the relief under Sections 18 to 22 has been sought.

4.

Since learned Counsel for Respondent No. 1 has sought a short accommodation, let these matters come up on board on 20.01.2026. 5.

In the meanwhile, there shall be ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (b) in both the Applications until further orders. 6.

Learned Counsel for the Applicant to inform the learned Judge of the Family Court, Nashik and the learned JMFC, Nashik about order passed today.

(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)