Pratiksha Srinivas Rathod @ Pratiksha Namdev Pawar v. Savita Vinayak Rathod And ANR

KVM 1/1 61 - MCA 334 OF 2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

by KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR Date:

2025.10.14 16:57:32 +0530 KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 334/2025 PINKI BHAVESH NAGDA NEE PINKI CHANDRAKANT SHAH ..APPLICANT VS BHAVESH NARENDRA NAGDA ..RESPONDENT Mr. Prathamesh Mondal for the Applicant.

None for the Respondent.

CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

DATE : 13 OCTOBER, 2025 P.C. :- 1) None appears for the respondent though office remark shows that the respondent has been duly served. Mr.Mondal, learned advocate appearing for the applicant submits that the respondent has been served also by the private notice and an affidavit of service to that effect is already filed.

2) None appears for the respondent when the matter is called out.

3) In order to give one more chance to the respondent to make his submissions, stand over to 11 November, 2025. 4) In the meanwhile, there will be ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (b), till the next date of the hearing. [RAJESH S. PATIL, J.]