Chetna Ravishankar Bamne Chetna P Uttamrao Mukte v. Mr. Ravishankar Padmakarrao Bamne

KVM 1/2 59 - MCA 363 OF 2025.doc by KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR Date:

2025.11.15 18:03:11 +0530

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 363 OF 2025 CHETNA RAVISHANKAR BAMNE CHETNA P UTTAMRAO MUKTE ..... APPLICANT

VERSUS

RAVISHANKAR PADMAKARRAO BAMNE ..... RESPONDENT Adv. Sunil S. Upadhyay i/b. Adv. Prabhat Upadhyay for the Applicant. Adv. Hrishabh Vakhariya (Thr. V.C.) a/w. Adv. Shubham Diwan for the Respondent.

CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

DATE : 14 NOVEMBER, 2025 P.C. :- 1) Learned advocate Mr.Hrishabh Vakhariya appears on behalf of the respondent and seeks a short accommodation. Mr.Upadhyay, learned advocate appears on behalf of the applicant, wife of the respondent submits that the applicant is working in Pune City and is staying at Pune alongwith 12 years old daughter. Her daughter is studying in school at Pune. According to him, the respondent-husband has filed divorce proceeding at Family Court at Nanded which is around 441 kms from Pune. Therefore, it will be

KVM 2/2 59 - MCA 363 OF 2025.doc inconvenient for the applicant-wife to attend the court proceeding in Nanded Family Court, and to travel from Pune to Nanded which is around 441 kms and to travel back the same distance of 441 kms on the same day. Therefore, it will be convenient for the applicant if the proceedings are transferred from Pune to Nanded. 2) At the request of learned advocate for the respondent, stand over to 18 November, 2025.

[RAJESH S. PATIL, J.]