Chetna Ravishankar Bamne Chetna P Uttamrao Mukte v. Mr. Ravishankar Padmakarrao Bamne

902. MCA 363-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 363 OF 2025 ANAND SUDHAKAR SUDAME Chetana Ravishankar Bamne alias ..Applicant Hetna P. Uttamrao Mukte

Versus

Ravishankar Padmakarrao Bamne ..Respondent ANAND SUDHAKAR SUDAME Date: 2025.12.01 20:50:52 +0530 Mr. Sushil Upadhyay i/b. Mr. Prabhat Upadhyay, Advocates, for the Applicant Mr. Rishabh Vakharia, Advocate, for the Respondent CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

DATE : 28.11.2025 P. C.

1.

By the present transfer Application, the Applicant, who is the wife of the Respondent is seeking transfer of the divorce proceeding filed by the Respondent - husband before the Family Court, Nanded to the Family Court, Pune.

2.

After the matter was argued for some time, learned Counsel for the Respondent, on instructions, from his client submits that his client has no objection, if the divorce proceeding filed by the Respondent - husband is transferred from the Family Court, Nanded to the Family Court, Pune.

3.

In view of the statement made by learned Counsel for the Anand

902. MCA 363-2025.doc Respondent, on instructions, from his client, the Miscellaneous Civil Application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). 4.

The Respondent is directed to attend the Court proceedings before the Family Court, Pune through VC mode. However, learned Judge, Family Court, Pune is of the view that the Respondent should attend the Court proceedings on a particular date physically then he will have to attend the Court proceeding physically. (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) Anand