Vaishnavi Prasad Dhanorkar v. Prasad Ramesh Dhanorkar

28. MCA 365-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 365 OF 2025 ANAND SUDHAKAR SUDAME Vaishnavi Prasad Dhanorkar ..Applicant

Versus

ANAND SUDHAKAR SUDAME Date: 2025.12.01 17:59:19 +0530 Prasad Ramesh Dhanorkar ..Respondent Mr. S. S. Bedekar, Advocate, for the Applicant CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

DATE : 28.11.2025 P. C.

1.

Mr. Bedekar, learned Counsel for the Applicant submits that the Respondent could not be served at his residential address as the Respondent has now changed his residential place. However, service is effected on his office address. He further seeks liberty to serve the Respondent's Advocate who is appearing before the learned CJSD, Pune in the Petition filed for restitution of conjugal rights. 2.

Liberty as prayed for is granted.

3.

Learned Counsel for the Applicant to serve the learned Counsel for the Respondent who is appearing before the learned CJSD, Pune in the Petition filed for restitution of conjugal rights and file Affidavit of service before the next date of hearing.

4.

Stand over to 15.12.2025.

Anand

28. MCA 365-2025.doc 5.

Ad-interim relief, if any, granted earlier to continue till the next date of hearing.

(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) Anand