Kirti Sandip Tupe v. Sandeep Bahiru Tupe

KVM 1/2 19 - MCA 467 OF 2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

by KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR Date:

2026.02.06 17:44:14 +0530 KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 467/2025 KIRTI SANDIP TUPE ..... APPLICANT

VERSUS

SANDEEP BAHIRU TUPE ..... RESPONDENT Adv. Sachin Padaye for the Applicant.

Adv. Shruti P. Pokale i/b. Adv. Nagesh Khedekar for the Respondent. CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

DATE : 23 JANUARY, 2026 P.C. :- 1) By the present transfer proceedings, the applicant, wife of the respondent is seeking transfer of respondent's Section 9 restitution of conjugal rights proceedings pending before the Civil Judge Senior Division, Panvel to the Civil Judge Senior Division, Nashik. 2) It is the case of the applicant that she is unemployed and is residing at Nashik. She is staying with her parents alongwith four years old daughter and the respondent is employed as assistant director in the company, where he earns around Rs.50 lacs per annum and the respondent-husband is not paying any amount towards This order is corrected as per order dated 04.02.2026.

KVM 2/2 19 - MCA 467 OF 2025.doc maintenance to the applicant or to their daughter. 3) Ms. Pokale, learned advocate instructed by advocate Mr. Khedekar seeks a short accommodation to file Vakalatnama and reply. 4) At the request being made by the respondent's advocate stand over to 4 February, 2026.

5) In the meanwhile, there will be ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause (c) till the next date of the hearing. (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) This order is corrected as per order dated 04.02.2026.