Madan S/O. Akant Matey v. Hon'Ble Miinister, State Of Maha., Thr. Secy., Depatment Of Urban Development, Mumbai And ORS.

2026:BHC-NAG:1130-DB 26.cp.318.25 1/1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Contempt Petition No.318 of 2025 in Writ Petition No.7050 of 2024 (D) Madan s/o Akant Matey vs.

Hon'ble Minister, State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Department of Urban Development, Mumbai and others =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Mr. S.G. Jagtap, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. A.B. Badar, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1.

Mr. G.A. Kunte, Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 to 4.

CORAM

: ANIL L. PANSARE & NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, JJ.

DATE : 22 nd JANUARY, 2026.

In view of the subsequent development, since the decision is taken in terms of order under question, though belatedly, we grant liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy, as is available in law, against the order so passed. Thus, no fruitful purpose will be served by pursuing the contempt jurisdiction. The contempt petition is, accordingly, disposed of. (Nivedita P. Mehta, J.) (Anil L. Pansare, J.) *sandesh Signed by: Mr. Sandesh Waghmare Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 23/01/2026 14:13:22