Bharath Traders, A Proprietorship Firm, Thr. Authorized Officer Arshad Sek S/O Shek Ekbal And 1 v. The State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Police Officer, Saoner Police Station And Another

1 20 CP 338.25.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO.338 OF 2025 [Bharath Traders and one .vs. State of Maharashtra and another] - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. S.A. Mohta, Advocate for Petitioner.

..............

CORAM : PRAVIN S. PATIL, J.

DATED : 13.11.2025 .

1.

By this petition, it is alleged that there is a deliberate and intentional disobedience on the part of respondent no.2. 2.

To substantiate this fact, the petitioner has relied upon Clauses (v) and (vii) of the operative part of the judgment delivered by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-15, Nagpur in Criminal Revision Application No.228/2025. The petitioner further pointed out that there is compliance on his part as per the directions issued by the learned Sessions Judge. Prima facie, it seems that there is a disobedience on the part of the Investigation Officer.

3.

Hence, issue notice only to respondent no.2, returnable on 25.11.2025.

(PRAVIN S. PATIL, J.) Gulande Signed by: A.S. GULANDE Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 13/11/2025 14:06:08