Parvath Shetty v. State Of Maharashtra Thr The Minister Co Operation And ORS

k 1/2 5-6 rpw 71.25 N 72.25 as.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO.71 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5111 OF 2024 Yogesh Shetty & Ors.

....Petitioners V/S State of Maharashtra & Ors.

....Respondents WITH REVIEW PETITION NO.72 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5312 OF 2024 Parvath Shetty ....Petitioner V/S State of Maharashtra & Ors.

....Respondents _________ Mr. Bhavesh Magam for the Petitioners in Review Petition No.71 of 2025.

Mr. Sagar Talekar for the Petitioner in Review Petition No.72 of 2025.

Mr. Kunal Dwarkadas with Mr. Siddharth Joshi, Mr. Akshit Dedhia, Mr. Minhas Joshi i/b M/s. Wadia Gandy for Respondent No.4 in Review Petition No.71 of 2025.

Mr. Tanu N. Bhatia, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3 /State in Review Petition No.72 of 2025.

__________ CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.

DATE : 21 APRIL 2025.

katkam Page No.

1 of

k 2/2 5-6 rpw 71.25 N 72.25 as.doc P.C.:

1.

These Petitions are filed seeking review of the judgment and order dated 21 February 2025.

2.

I have heard Mr. Talekar and Mr. Magam, the learned counsel appearing for the Review Petitioners. After having considered the submissions canvassed by them, it appears that the Review Petitions are filed as if the same are Appeals in disguise. No error apparent on face of record is demonstrated before me during the course of their submissions. No ground for review is made out. By filing Review Petitions, Petitioners cannot urge this Court to take a different view than the one taken while delivering the judgment under review. In that view of the matter, both the Review Petitions are rejected. (SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.) by SUDARSHAN RAJALINGAM KATKAM Date:

2025.04.22 15:45:55 +0530 SUDARSHAN RAJALINGAM KATKAM katkam Page No.

2 of