The Agricultural Produce Market Committee v. Tejas Sharad Londhe
2025:BHC-AS:28284-DB Sayyed 2-RPW.106.2025.docx IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO.106 OF 2025 REVIEW PETITION NO.106 OF 2025 IN IN WRIT PETITION NO.2091 OF 2025 WRIT PETITION NO.2091 OF 2025 The Agricultural Produce Market The Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Nashik Committee, Nashik ...
...Petitioner
Petitioner
Versus
Versus
Tejas Sharad Londhe & Ors.
Tejas Sharad Londhe & Ors.
...
...Respondents
Respondents _____________________________________________________ Mr. Sachin Gite for the Petitioner.
Mr. Sachin Gite for the Petitioner.
Mr. Vinayak B. Gadekar for the Respondents.
Mr. Vinayak B. Gadekar for the Respondents.
_____________________________________________________ CORAM :
M. S. Sonak & Jitendra Jain, JJ.
DATED : 10 July 2025 PC.:- 1.
After arguing this review petition for some time, Mr. Gite, on After arguing this review petition for some time, Mr. Gite, on instructions, withdraws this review petition with liberty to pursue the instructions, withdraws this review petition with liberty to pursue the issue of settlement before the District Court. However, he requests for issue of settlement before the District Court. However, he requests for two weeks extension to deposit the amount of Rs.75 lakhs before the two weeks extension to deposit the amount of Rs.75 lakhs before the Principal District Court at Nashik.
Principal District Court at Nashik.
2.
The learned counsel for the Petitioner points out that the time The learned counsel for the Petitioner points out that the time limit for deposit has expired on 24 June 2025. limit for deposit has expired on 24 June 2025. 3.
Now that a firm statement is made that the amount would be Now that a firm statement is made that the amount would be deposited within two weeks from today without seeking any extension, deposited within two weeks from today without seeking any extension, we extend the time for deposit upto the 24 July 2025. If no deposit is we extend the time for deposit upto the 24 July 2025. If no deposit is made by 24 July 2025, then, it would be obvious that this review made by 24 July 2025, then, it would be obvious that this review petition was filed only to buy time and take advantage of the petition was filed only to buy time and take advantage of the indulgence already shown to Agricultural Produce Market Committee indulgence already shown to Agricultural Produce Market Committee
Sayyed 2-RPW.106.2025.docx (APMC) by the order of which review is applied. A compliance report (APMC) by the order of which review is applied. A compliance report must be filed by 28 July 2025.
must be filed by 28 July 2025.
4.
Though, we are allowing the withdrawal of this review Though, we are allowing the withdrawal of this review petition with liberty and disposing of the same, we post the matter on petition with liberty and disposing of the same, we post the matter on 30 July 2025 for directions to enable APMC to report compliance. 30 July 2025 for directions to enable APMC to report compliance. 5.
We note that this petition was filed by We note that this petition was filed by Tejas Sharad Londhe Tejas Sharad Londhe and 24 others. However, the cause title does not correctly reflect this and 24 others. However, the cause title does not correctly reflect this position. Accordingly, the cause title is directed to be corrected. position. Accordingly, the cause title is directed to be corrected. (Jitendra Jain, J.) (M. S. Sonak, J.) Signed by: Sayyed Saeed Ali Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 11/07/2025 11:31:12