← Library
Bombay High CourtRPW/130/2025dismissed

Pnc Aakshya Joint Venture v. Thakur Infraprojects Private Limited

2025-08-25Hon'Ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'Ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Digitally signed by URMILA PRAMOD INGALE Date:

2025.08.25 18:36:09 +0530 URMILA PRAMOD INGALE WRIT PETITION NO. 10537 OF 2025 Thakur Infraprojects Private Limited ... Petitioner

Versus

State of Maharashtra and ors.

.... Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION STAMP NO. 26489 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 10537 OF 2025 M/s. PNC-Aakshya Joint Venture .. Applicant In the matter between Thakur Infraprojects Private Limited ... Petitioner

Versus

State of Maharashtra and ors.

.... Respondents WITH REVIEW PETITION NO. 130 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 13976 OF 2024 M/s. PNC-Aakshya Joint Venture .. Petitioner In the matter between Thakur Infraprojects Private Limited ... Petitioner

Versus

State of Maharashtra and ors.

.... Respondents **** Mr. Zal Andhyarujina, Senior Advocate with Mr. Drupad Vaghani, Ms. Gayatri Mohite, Ms. Akanksha Agarwal & Mr. Ashwath Reddy i/b Anchorstone Legal, for the Petitioner in WP/10537/2025.

Mr. Vikas Singh, Senior Advocate and Mr. Ashish Kamat, Senior Advocate with Mr. Chirag Shah, Ms. Deeplika Kalia, Mr. Harsh Moorjani, Mr. Jay Sanklecha, Mr. Aman Saraf i/b Ms. Ekta Dalvi, for Petitioner in RPW/130/2025 & for Applicant in IAST/26489/2025. Ms. Neha S. Bhide, Govt. Pleader with Mr. Ο.Λ. Chandurkar, Addl. GP, Ms. Apurva Thipsay, 'B' Panel Counsel & Mrs. G.R. Raghuwanshi, AGP, for State, Respondent No.1.

Mr. Chetan Kapadia, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rahul Sinha, Mr. Mahir Sikarwar, Mr. Soham Bhalerao & Mr. Harshit Tyagi i/b DSK Legal, for CIDCO, Respondent No. 2.

**** CORAM : ALOK ARADHE, CJ & M.S.KARNIK, J.

(THROUGH V.C.) DATE :

25th AUGUST, 2025 P.C. :

1.

Heard on Interim Application Stamp No.26489 of 2025 which is an application for intervention filed on behalf of M/s. PNC-Aakshya Joint Venture.

2.

After hearing learned Senior Counsel for the parties and for the reasons assigned in the application which is duly supported by an affidavit, the proposed intervener is impleaded as respondent no. 4. Learned Senior Counsel for respondent no. 4 undertakes to file an affidavit-in-reply on or before 04/09/2025.

3.

Needless to state that learned Counsel for CIDCO shall be at liberty to file the response, if so advised and the petitioner shall also be at liberty to file rejoinder affidavit on or before 06/09/2025. 4.

List this writ petition along with review petition on 08/09/2025 at 3.30 p.m.

(M.S.KARNIK, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)