Surendra Damodharrao Bakale v. State Of Maharashtra Rural Development Dept., Thr. Secretary, Mumbai And Another

2025:BHC-NAG:4633-DB 1 20.wp.101.25

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.101/2025 Surendra Damodharrao Bakale Vs. State of Maharashtra and Anr. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mrs. B. P. Maldhure, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. H. D. Marathe A.G.P. for Respondent No.1/State. CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE AND MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ.

DATED : 02/05/2025.

Heard.

2.

Vide impugned order of transfer, the petitioner is posted at Kotha in Dharni Taluka, which is said to be a difficult area.

3.

But for the first posting in the difficult area, the petitioner has never served being an employee of the Zilla Parishad in the capacity of Assistant Teacher. 4.

The transfer is an incidence of service, which fact was well within the knowledge of the petitioner at the time of appointment itself.

5.

The cut-off date, which is considered by the Zilla Parishad, in the aforesaid background, will be of hardly any consequences, which is sought to be assailed. 6.

That being so, there is no merit in the petition. The same is dismissed.

(MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.) RGurnule Signed by: Mrs. R.M. MANDADE Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 03/05/2025 14:21:26