Purushottam S/O. Kailash Giri And Others v. State Of Maha., Thr. Principal Secy. Urban Development Dept. - 2, Mumbai And ANR

2025:BHC-NAG:3952-DB wp210.2025.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.210/2025 (Purushottam S/o Kailash Giri and others Vs. The State of Maharashtra another) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -------------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------------------------------------ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ms. Madhura Bhande, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. I.J. Damle, A.G.P. for respondent No.1.

Mr. J.B. Kasat, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM: NITIN W. SAMBRE & MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ. DATED: 16.4.2025.

Heard.

2.

We direct the respondent Urban Development Department to decide the proposal submitted by the respondent employer i.e. Nagpur Municipal Corporation as reflected in the communication dated 20.12.2024 as expeditiously as possible and in any case, within a period of three months from today.

3.

Writ petition is disposed of accordingly without costs. 4.

Liberty to approach afresh in case if a cause to that effect survives or accrues afresh.

5.

Needless to clarify that we have not gone into merits of the matter.

(MRS.VRUSHALI V.JOSHI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.) Tambaskar.

Signed by: MR. N.V. TAMBASKAR Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 21/04/2025 14:57:08