← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/2530/2025disposed off

Ajit Jasbir Singh Gandhi v. Union Of India,Thr. Chairman, Ministry Of Environment, Forest And Cilmate Change, New Delhi And ORS

2025-05-08Hon'Ble Shri Justice Avinash G. Gharote , Hon'Ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri4 pages

2025:BHC-NAG:4930-DB 1 31.WP.2530-2025. JUDGMENT.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.

OF 20 Ajit Jasbir Singh Gandhi, Aged about 40 years, resident of Shakti Chowk, Balaghat Road, in front of PWD Office, Gondia 441614.

PETITIONER

Versus

1.

The Union of India through its Chairman, Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Indira Paryavaran Bhawan, Jorbagh Road, New Delhi-110 003.

2.

The Member Secretary, State Environment Impact Assessment Authority, State of Maharashtra Department of Environment and Climate Change Government of Maharashtra, Mantralaya, Mumbai.

3.

The Collector, Gondia, Collectorate Administrative Building, Amgaon Road, Fulchur Tola, Gondia 441601.

4.

District Mining Officer, Collectorate Administrative Building, Amgaon Road, Fulchur Tola, Gondia 441601.

RESPONDENTS

2 31.WP.2530-2025. JUDGMENT.odt - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. A.A. Naik, Senior Advocate a/b Mr. H.S. Chitaley, Advocate for the Petitioner.

Mr. S.A. Chaudhari, Advocate for the Respondent No.1. Mr. A.M. Joshi, AGP for the Respondent Nos.2 to 4/State. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ.

DATED : 8th MAY, 2025 ORAL JUDGMENT :- (PER : AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.) 1.

Heard.

2.

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith.

3.

Mr. Chaudhari, learned Counsel, waives notice for the Respondent No.1.

4.

Mr. Joshi, learned AGP, waives notice for the Respondent Nos.2 to 4/State.

5.

Heard finally, with the consent of the learned Counsel appearing for the rival parties.

3 31.WP.2530-2025. JUDGMENT.odt 6.

The Petition seeks a limited relief for direction to the Respondent No.2, to decide the proposal for reappraisal and validity of the Environmental Clearance already granted to the Petitioner and similarly situated persons, which has been sent to the Respondent No.2 on 31.12.2024 (page 89) by the Respondent No.4.

7.

It is contended, that a list sent on 01.01.2025 has already been cleared, however, the earlier list which is dated 31.12.2024, is still pending. Since that is the limited relief claimed by the Petitioner, we dispose of the Petition by directing the Respondent No.2, to scrutinize and take a decision regarding the reappraisal and validity of the proposals as sent to it under the list dated 31.12.2024 (page 89), within a period of two weeks from today.

8.

The Petition is accordingly disposed off in the above terms. No costs.

9.

Rule accordingly.

4 31.WP.2530-2025. JUDGMENT.odt 10.

Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of accordingly.

(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.) S.D.Bhimte Signed by: Mr.S.D.Bhimte Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 08/05/2025 17:41:40