← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/6671/2025partly allowed

Mr. Ujwal Babarao Bhondwe v. The State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Secy., School Education Department, Mumbai And ORS.

2026-01-29Hon'Ble Smt. Justice M. S. Jawalkar , Hon'Ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao Deshpande3 pages

2026:BHC-NAG:1632-DB J-wp6671.25.odt 1/3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION No.6671 OF 2025 Mr. Ujwal Babarao Bhondwe, Age - 30 yrs., Occ- service, R/o. C/o. Dnyneshwar Ingle, Parshuram Colony, Gedam Layout, Simbhora Road, Morshi, Taluka Morshi, Distt. Amravati.

: PETITIONER ...VERSUS...

1. The State of Maharashtra, Through Secretary, School Education Department, Madam Cama Road, Hutatma Rajguru Chowk, Mantralaya, Mumbai 400032.

2. The Education officer (Secondary), Zillha Parishad Amravati, Main Administrative Building, Zilla Parishad, Amravati-444602.

3. The Head Master, Satpuda Madhyamik Vidyalaya, Pala, Taluka Morshi, Dist. Amravati, Maharashtra.

4. The President, Satpuda welfare society Salbardi Reg no. 1202, Pala, Taluka-Morshi, Dist. Amravati, Maharashtra.

: RESPONDENTS =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Mr. D.. Bhongade, Advocate for Petitioner.

Mr. H.D. Futane, Assistant Government Pleader for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.

Mr. A.U. Deshmukh, Advocate for Respondent Nos.3 and 4. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

J-wp6671.25.odt 2/3 CORAM : SMT. M.S. JAWALKAR AND NANDESH S. DESHPANDE, JJ.

DATE : 29 th JANUARY, 2026.

ORAL JUDGMENT : (Per : NANDESH S. DESHPANDE, J.) 1.

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of parties.

2.

This is a petition seeking a direction to the respondent Nos.3 and 4 to forward the proposal of the petitioner along with all necessary documents to the Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Amravati within the stipulated period of time. 3.

We have heard Mr. D.P. Bhongade, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. H.D. Futane, learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent Nos.1 and 2 and Mr. A.U. Deshmukh, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.3 and 4. 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that even though he was appointed vide order dated 29.7.2024, the Management has failed to forward the proposal to the Education Officer for approval.

5.

Learned counsel for the respondent Nos.3 and 4 submits that in fact they had sent the proposal but certain deficiencies were pointed out by the Office of the Education Officer. He invites our attention to the letter dated 8.1.2025 and submits

J-wp6671.25.odt 3/3 that those deficiencies have not been complied with or completed in spite of repeated reminders to the petitioner in that regard. 6.

Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that he would cure all the deficiencies, as enumerated in letter dated 8.1.2025 within a period of three weeks from today. 7.

In that view of the matter, we dispose of the petition with following directions. We, therefore, pass the following order :

O R D E R

(i) The writ petition is partly allowed.

(ii) It it hereby directed that the petitioner would cure all the deficiencies at his end as reflected in the letter dated 8.1.2025 within three weeks from today.

(iii) After curing all the deficiencies the respondent Nos.3 and 4 are directed to submit said proposal to the Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Amravati i.e. respondent No.2 within a week thereafter.

(iv) With these directions the petition is disposed of. (v) Rule is made absolute in the above terms.

(NANDESH S. DESHPANDE, J.) (SMT. M.S. JAWALKAR, J.) wadode Signed by: Mr. Devendra Wadode Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 02/02/2026 16:52:36