Sagar S/O Rajesh Shukla v. Komal W/O Sagar Shukla

2025:BHC-NAG:15126-DB

(1) 6.CAO66.26

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAO) NO. 66 OF 2026 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL (ST.) NO. 9627 OF 2025 SAGAR S/O RAJESH SHUKLA Vs.

KOMAL W/O SAGAR SHUKLA -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. S. S. Deshpande, counsel for the appellant CORAM :

SMT. M.S. JAWALKAR AND NANDESH S. DESHPANDE, JJ.

DATED : 04.02.2026 1.

Heard Mr. S. S. Deshpande, learned counsel for the applicant/appellant, who submits that even though the first appeal in question was filed on 07.04.2025, the office has raised an objection that there is a delay of 14 days. 2.

On perusal of the said application, we are satisfied and, more particularly, in view of paragraph 2 of the said application, the delay is liable to be condoned. 3.

The Civil Application is allowed and disposed of as such.

FAMILY COURT APPEAL (ST.) NO. 9627 OF 2025 1.

Issue notice to the respondent, returnable on 13.03.2026.

(2) 6.CAO66.26 2.

Learned Counsel for the appellant is permitted to serve the respondent, by all modes permissible in law, in addition to regular mode of service.

3.

Learned counsel for the appellant to file an affidavit of service in that regard before the returnable date. (NANDESH S. DESHPANDE, J.) (SMT. M.S. JAWALKAR AND, J.) Shubham