← Library
Bombay High CourtCAO/982/2025allowed

The United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Through Divisional Manager Amravati v. Laxman Narayan Dhote And 2 Others

2025-09-03Hon'Ble Shri Justice Pravin S. Patil1 pages

1 37.cao.982.2025

IN THE HIGH

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 982 OF 2025 IN MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.606 OF 2025 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 344 OF 2017 United Indian Insurance Company ..vs..

Laxman Narayan Dhote and ors.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri M.R. Joharapurkar, Advocate for the applicant. Ms. Aastha Sharma, Advocate for respondent no.1. Shri U.K. Bisen, Adovcate for respondent no.3. CORAM: PRAVIN S. PATIL, J.

DATED : 03/09/2025.

Heard.

2.

By this application the applicant is seeking condonation of delay of 3536 days in filing the restoration application which came to be dismissed against respondent no. 3.

3.

The applicants has points out that in one Civil Application No.3204 of 2014, this Court found that respondent no. 3 was represented by the Counsel and accordingly he was requested to take instructions, however as the Counsel did not receive the instruction he did not appear in the matter.

4.

Hence, considering the above said position, issue notice to the respondent no. 3, returnable on 24.09.2025. 5.

Leave is granted to serve the respondent no.3 by all permissible modes.

6.

First Appeal Nos.50/2013, 285/2015, 465/2015, 49/2013 be tagged with the present appeal.

Signed by: Trupti D. Agrawal Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 04/09/2025 18:23:29 (PRAVIN S. PATIL , J.

) Trupti