Shrutika Sachin Mahadik And ORS. v. Bombay Electric Supply And Transport Undertaking, Thr. Manager And ANR.

09-FA(ST)-26194-2025.DOC Rekha Patil

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 26194 OF 2025 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 10604 OF 2025 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 10603 OF 2025 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 26 OF 2026 The Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai Thr.

The General Manager And Anr.

...Appellant

Versus

Shrutika Sachin Mahadik And Ors.

...Respondents

Ms. Swati Sawant i/b S. K. Legal & Associate, for the Appellant. Ms. Ketki Gokhale i/b A. M. Gokhale, for the Respondents.

CORAM:

R. M. JOSHI, J.

DATED:

6th JANUARY 2026 PC:- 1.

During the course of the hearing while justifying the delay of 722 days, it is sought to be argued on behalf of the appellant that on account of the time spent for seeking opinion and taking decision, the delay has been caused. Learned Counsel is called upon to provide names of the persons, who are responsible for the delay. It is clarified that in case the delay is condoned, the same REKHA PRAKASH PATIL REKHA PRAKASH PATIL Date: 2026.01.07 18:02:10 +0530 6th January 2026

09-FA(ST)-26194-2025.DOC would be condoned subject to payment of substantial costs recoverable from each of the person, who is responsible for the delay.

2.

At the request of learned Counsel for the Appellant, stand over to 14th January, 2026.

(R. M. JOSHI, J.) { 6th January 2026