← Library
Bombay High CourtIA/525/2026disposed off

Kacharabai Sadu Jadhav -Deceased Thr. Lrs. 1-Janabai Keru Aher And ORS. v. The State Of Maharashtra Through The S.L.A.O.

2026-01-30Hon'Ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil2 pages

KVM 1/2 27 - IA 525 OF 2026.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

by KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR Date:

2026.02.03 11:42:22 +0530 KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 525 OF 2026 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 33224/2018 JANABAI KERU AHER & ORS.

..... APPLICANTS

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN

KACHRABAI SADU JADHAV ..... APPELLANT VS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.

..... RESPONDENTS Adv. Ashish Gabhale i/b. Jay & Co. for the Appellant. Mr. A. R. Patil, Additional G.P. for the State/Respondents. CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

DATE : 30 JANUARY, 2026 P.C. :- 1) Not on board. Taken on board.

2) This interim application has been filed to bring on record the legal heirs of the sole appellant. There is delay in filing the present Interim Application.

3) Heard learned advocate for the applicant and Additional Government Pleader and I have gone through the documents on record.

KVM 2/2 27 - IA 525 OF 2026.doc 4) The Division Bench of this Court in Keshao s/o. Kawadu Maral and another Versus State of Maharashtra and others, reported in 2005 (1) MahLJ 1059, condoned the delay of six years in filing the Application of bringing the legals heirs on record, relying on the Supreme Court judgment of Sardar Amarjit Singh Karla (dead) by LRS. and others Versus Pramod Gupta (Smt.) (dead) by LRS. and others, reported in 2003 (3) SCC 272..

5) Taking into consideration the law laid down in the above judgments and for the reasons stated in the application, I am convinced that this Interim Application requires to be allowed. 6) The present Interim Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).

7) Amendment to be carried out within a period of two weeks from today.

8) Interim Application is accordingly disposed of. (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)