← Library
Bombay High CourtIA/1407/2025dismissed for noncomplying conditional order

Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation Thr. The Genral Manager v. Pandit Baburao Chaure And ORS.

2025-04-02Shri. S.R. Agrawal, Registrar(Judl Ii)2 pages

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1407 OF 2025 ALONGWITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1408 OF 2025 IN FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 3686 OF 2025 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's order appearance, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : SHRI. S.R. AGRAWAL REGISTRAR (JUDL -II) DATE : 02/04/2025 Adv. Abhijeet Phulsundar i/by Adv. D.D. Rananaware present for the Applicant The above numbered Interim Applications are listed for second time on the Board of Registrar for supplying copies. Already two weeks time was granted. However, despite of granting two weeks time, the Advocate for the Applicant has not supplied copies for issuing Notices to respondent Nos. 1 to 3.

In view of provisions under Chapter VII, Rule 2 (iii) of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 matters to be dismissed for non-prosecution in case of default of payment of process fess and failure to supply copies - Immediately after the expiry of the time prescribed in the foregoing sub-rules of this rule for the supply of copies, the Office shall place before the Registrar all such matters in which the process fees have not been paid and/or the copies have not been supplied within the prescribed time, and the Registrar shall dismiss all such matters for failure to prosecute. As such, the prescribed time to supply copies, as

provided under Rules,1960 has been expired. 02 weeks time was granted, but all in vain. The matter is lying ideally without any progress as learned Advocate for the Applicant has not taken any steps. However, instead of passing order of dismissal outrightly, it would be just and proper to give one more opportunity to supply the necessary copies.

In turn, the learned advocate for the applicant is directed to supply necessary copies within 02 weeks without fail. On failure, the Interim Applications, if any would stand dismissed against respondent Nos. 1 to 3 without further reference to the Court of Registrar. If copies supplied, issue notices to respondent Nos. 1 to 3, returnable by ten weeks.

Sd/- REGISTRAR (JUDL-II) sat-R(J-II)-02.04.2025