M/S. Prestige Falcon Mumbai Realty Pvt. Ltd. v. Suresh Dinkar Mangaonkar And ORS.

908-(b)-IA-2829-2025.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2829 OF 2025 IN INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 15707 OF 2024 TALLE SHUBHAM ASHOKRAO IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1077 OF 2022 TALLE SHUBHAM ASHOKRAO Date: 2025.04.30 10:28:43 +0530 M/s. Prestige Falcon Mumbai Realty Pvt. Ltd.

...Applicant.

In the matter between Suresh Dinkar Mangaonkar & Ors.

... Appellants.

Versus

Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority.

...Respondent

------ Adv. Akshay B. Udeshi i/by A. U. Legal for the Appellants. Ms. Saloni Shah and Mr. Mustafa Nulwalla i/by Trilegal for the Respondent No. 2.

------ Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.

Date : April 25, 2025.

P. C. :

1.

The Application has been filed by the Applicants to intervene in the present proceedings as the Applicant is Developer who has been appointed to develop the property by MHADA. Considering that the dispute has been resolved between the Developer on one hand and the Appellants on the other, learned Counsel for the Appellants does not oppose the said Application. 2.

In light of the above, proposed Respondent No. 2 is Shubham Talle 1 of

908-(b)-IA-2829-2025.doc permitted to be impleaded as party Respondent to the First Appeal and all Interim Applications.

3.

In connected First Appeal No. 347 of 2022 and First Appeal No. 1302 of 2022, an oral request is made on behalf of the learned Counsel for the Appellant and Developer jointly that the Developer be permitted to be impleaded as Respondent No. 2 so that the Consent Terms can be tendered.

4.

In view of the amicable settlement between the Developer and the proposed Respondent No. 2, the impleadment is allowed. Amendment to be carried out in course of the day. Reverification is dispensed with.

[Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.] Shubham Talle 2 of