← Library
Bombay High CourtIA/3885/2025allowed

Jilani Akbar Kokani v. Aslam Akbar Kokani And ORS

2025-07-10Hon'Ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav2 pages

918.IA.3885.25.doc Ajay IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3878 OF 2025 IN REVIEW PETITION NO. 46 OF 2025 Jilani Akbar Kokani .. Applicant

IN THE MATTER OF

Jilani Akbar Kokani .. Review Petitioner

Versus

Aslam Akbar Kokani and Ors.

.. Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3885 OF 2025 IN REVIEW PETITION NO. 47 OF 2025 Jilani Akbar Kokani .. Applicant

IN THE MATTER OF

Jilani Akbar Kokani .. Review Petitioner

Versus

Aslam Akbar Kokani and Ors.

.. Respondents ....................

 Mr. Alankar Kirpekar a/w. Mr. S.C. Chandratre, Advocates for Applicant.

 Mr. R.D. Soni, Advocate for Respondents.

....................

CORAM

: MILIND N. JADHAV, J.

DATE : JULY 10, 2025.

P.C.:

1.

Heard Mr. Kirpekar, learned Advocate for Applicant and Mr. Soni, learned Advocate for Respondents.

2.

Interim Applications are filed by the Applicant for seeking condonation of delay in filing the Review Petitions. Review Petitions are filed for seeking review of the order dated 06.03.2024 passed in

918.IA.3885.25.doc Writ Petition No.5741 of 2023 and other companion matters. 3.

I have perused the Interim Applications.

4.

For the reasons stated in the Interim Applications, Interim Applications stand allowed. Delay in filing the Review Petitions stand condoned.

5.

Both Interim Applications are allowed and disposed. [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] Ajay AJAY TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE Date: 2025.07.10 18:04:39 +0530 AJAY TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE