Smt Shantabai Dattaray Patil v. Vijay Baban Parade

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

varsha CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 666 OF 2022 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 18981 OF 2022 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 20516 OF 2022 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 666 OF 2022 Vijay Baban Parade ... Appellant/Applicant vs.

Smt. Shantabai Dattatray Patil and Ors ... Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 4093 OF 2025 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 4090 OF 2025 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 666 OF 2022 Smt. Shantabai Dattatray Patil ...Applicant

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN

Vijay Baban Parade ... Appellant vs.

Smt. Shantabai Dattatray Patil and Ors ... Respondents WITH SECOND APPEAL NO. 183 OF 2023 Smt. Rukmini Pandurang Gosavi and Anr ... Appellants vs.

Smt. Shantabai Dattatraya Patil and Anr ... Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 6477 OF 2025 Page no. 1 of 3

IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 183 OF 2023 Smt. Shantabai Dattatraya Patil ... Applicant

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN

Smt. Rukmini Pandurang Gosavi and Anr ... Appellants vs.

Smt. Shantabai Dattatraya Patil and Anr ... Respondents Mr. Girish Godbole, Senior Advocate i/b. Mr.Shivraj Patne and Mr. Pradeep Salgar for original Appellant and Respondent in IA/6477/25.

Mr. Rahul Kasbekar for Respondent No.1 in both the SAs. CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.

DATED : 25th MARCH 2025 ORDER:

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 4090 OF 2025 .

1.

Learned counsel for the appellants seeks time to file affidavitin-reply. The reply to be filed within a week with an advance copy to the learned advocate for the applicant.

2.

Stand over to 24th June 2025.

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 4093 OF 2025 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 666 OF 2022 AND INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 6477 OF 2025 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 183 OF 2023 3.

These applications are for fixing early hearing. The second Page no. 2 of 3

appeals are not yet ready for final hearing.

4.

Even otherwise, there are large numbers of old second appeals pending for final hearing before this court. The appeals pending are also of the years 1982, 1986 and 1988. Hence, the request made by the learned counsel for the appellant for fixing early date of hearing cannot be considered at this stage. 5.

Interim Applications are therefore dismissed. (GAURI GODSE, J.) Page no. 3 of 3