Sharifa Chandsaheb Tamboli And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra Throu. Govt Pleader And ORS

16-IA-6828-2025.DOC Arun Sankpal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 6828 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2060 OF 2025 Sharifa Chansaheb Tamboli & Anr ..Applicants/ Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra Through Govt Pleader & Ors

...Respondents

Ms. Payal Yadav, with Suchita Garad, for the Petitioner/Applicant. Ms. Kavita N. Solunkhe, AGP, for the Respondent-State.

CORAM:

N. J. JAMADAR, J.

DATED :

4th JULY 2025 P.C.:

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 6828 OF 2025:

ARUN RAMCHANDRA SANKPAL 1.

Heard the learned Counsel for the Applicant.

ARUN RAMCHANDRA SANKPAL Date: 2025.07.05 13:48:33 +0530 2.

For the reasons assigned in the Application and to advance the cause of substantive justice, the order dated 17th February 2025, dismissing the Writ Petition for want of prosecution stands recalled and the Writ Petition No. 2060 of 2025, stands restored to file. 3.

The Application disposed.

1/2

16-IA-6828-2025.DOC WRIT PETITION NO. 2060 OF 2025:

4.

The challenge in this Petition is to an order dated 31st January 2024, passed by the Tahshildar, Madha, District Solapur, for carrying out the amendment in the order dated 27th February 2023 passed in Case No. tek&2@155@,l vkj@63@2022.

5.

The Petitioner has an efficacious alternate remedy of filing an appropriate proceeding before the Authorities under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

6.

The Writ Petition, therefore, does not deserves to be entertained. 7.

The Writ Petition stands dismissed with liberty to the Petitioner to approach the Authorities under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

8.

In the event the question of limitation arises, the time spent in prosecuting this petition may be accounted for under Section 14 of the Limitation Act.

9.

Petition dismissed.

[N. J. JAMADAR, J.] 2/2